657
that when he was appointed in 1892, his experience as Treasurer should be judged on his previous experience of Treasury work. It is clear that the dangerous system of allowing Clark to take charge of the rent roll and prepare the receipts for payments of rent to sequestrate receipts (which largely contributed to the facilitation of the fraud) was established by his predecessor.
That he was burdened with an incompetent staff, and was reluctant out of deference for their standing and length of service, to report to Government all the circumstances, including his letter of March 22nd 1892. The case should be judged not by the light of the obligations cast upon him by financial instruction No. 2, but by the light of the ordinary obligations that devolve upon a Treasurer, by the very nature of his office, in the absence of any special instructions. It should also, in my opinion, be judged on the basis of his having honestly, though mistakenly, entertained the view that he was not responsible for the safeguarding of Government moneys in his office. Further, it should be borne in mind that there has never been the faintest question of his personal integrity.
·
657
that when he was appointed
1892, his
Treasurer be
he head
✔
previous
be judged
experience of Treasury
that the dangerous system
Abo Clark whe
of allerviing
sin charge of the rent roll
and prepared the rece ipts f. -payments of rent to sequeste receipts (which largely contributed to the facilitations of the grand) was established by his predecessor.
that
be avas burd
with aw sincompetent staff.
avh
he Avas reluctant
of deference for their stand
and length
of
service, to
dig
report to Gove
veis of all
the circumstances,
including his letter of March 22od
1892
ed
ease should is fairness
not by the light of
the obligations cast upon hind by financial instruction No. 2, but by the light of the ordinary
obligations that devolve i
a Treasurer, by
ipso fact
of
the nature of his office, is the abcence of any special instructions. It should also in my opinion be judged
the basis of
his.
having honestly, though mistakenly,
entertar
一
red the ve is that
he
was not responsible for thie
safeguarding of
moneys
Government
in his office. Further
it should be borne
that
in mind
there has nevev
bear tho
faintest question of his personal
integrity
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.